Peterson Institute publications
The Peterson Institute for International Economics is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan
research institution devoted to the study of international economic policy. More › ›
RSS News Feed Search

Op-ed

Why the Euro Area Crisis Will Impact Little on Europe's Relations with China

by Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, Peterson Institute for International Economics

Op-ed in East Asia Forum Quarterly
April 3, 2012

© East Asia Forum Quarterly


A persistent theme since the beginning of the euro crisis in May 2010 has been whether China—with the world's largest foreign exchange reserves—would ride to Europe's rescue with a bailout, and if so, what political demands it would make in exchange for this favor.

But since December 2011 it has been abundantly clear that it is the European Central Bank (ECB) and not the Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange that will provide the cash the euro area needs to stabilize its financial system and its sovereign debt markets. So China's principal role in the euro crisis resolution will likely be as part of a coordinated G-20 effort pledging more money to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which will potentially be announced at the IMF and World Bank meetings in April 2012.

Since 2010 there have been rumors about large Chinese investments each time a senior Chinese official has visited Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, or Italy, but the reality is that no large transactions have taken place and no deals have been closed. The total Chinese exposure to the euro area's periphery financial assets has remained trivial, while the limited direct investments that have taken place have been strictly on a commercial basis as Chinese firms expand abroad. Given that Europe has relatively fewer national security concerns than the United States, it is expected that ongoing Chinese commercial investments in the European Union will accelerate in the future.

The Chinese government prudently refrained from directly investing official funds in the European Financial Stability Facility/European Stability Mechanism (EFSF/ESM) in 2011, when European leaders suggested that the fund could be "leveraged." China will instead only contribute through the much safer option of the IMF. Having risked very little to assist the euro in its hour of need, the euro area countries are not in a rush to arrange a quid pro quo. The only likely way China will benefit from the European crisis is by securing voting power at the IMF commensurate with the size of China's pledge to that organization.

Meanwhile, European leaders are aware that as the crisis unfolded China continued to gradually shift its foreign exchange reserves away from the US dollar and quite likely into the euro. In undertaking to diversify its reserves the Chinese government has adopted a sensible risk management strategy. This ongoing diversification has helped ensure the euro has retained its value throughout the crisis, despite widespread market predictions of its imminent collapse. But given that Europe is China's biggest export market, the Chinese government has good reason to ensure the dollar—and by extension the renminbi—does not fall too far against the euro. Implicit Chinese support for the euro in the global foreign exchange rate market via ongoing diversification is therefore hardly something the euro area leaders need to thank Beijing for. After all, whatever euros China has bought, it has done so with its own best interest in mind.

The euro area crisis is gradually stabilizing. Appropriately for a very wealthy region, the European Union has relied on its own resources to address the crisis, with the EFSF/ESM receiving a top-up by the IMF and China largely playing on the financial sidelines. As a result, it is not expected the crisis will lead to a sudden deepening of Euro-Sino relations. Certainly, the euro area will not be compelled to do China any particular favors in other policy areas, as reflected by ongoing disputes over airline emissions, the arms embargo, and various trade-related issues. So while strong economic and political relations between Europe and China are in the best interest of both parties, it is unlikely the euro area crisis will play any significant role in bringing about this outcome.


RELATED LINKS

Policy Brief 13-23: How to Form a More Perfect European Banking Union October 2013

Policy Brief 13-17: A Realistic Bridge Towards European Banking Union June 2013

Op-ed: Five Myths about the Euro Crisis September 7, 2012

Article: Why the Euro Will Survive: Completing the Continent's Half-Built House August 22, 2012

Testimony: Challenges of Europe's Fourfold Union August 1, 2012

Policy Brief 12-18: The Coming Resolution of the European Crisis: An Update June 2012

Book: Transatlantic Economic Challenges in an Era of Growing Multipolarity July 2012

Book: Resolving the European Debt Crisis March 2012

Working Paper 12-12: Sovereign Debt Sustainability in Italy and Spain: A Probabilistic Approach August 2012

Policy Brief 12-20: Why a Breakup of the Euro Area Must Be Avoided: Lessons from Previous Breakups August 2012

Policy Brief 12-5: Interest Rate Shock and Sustainability of Italy's Sovereign Debt February 2012

Speech: Italy's Effect on the Global Economy February 9, 2012

Policy Brief 12-4: The European Crisis Deepens January 2012

Policy Brief 11-21: What Can and Cannot Be Done about Rating Agencies November 2011

Policy Brief 11-13: Europe on the Brink July 2011

Working Paper 11-2: Too Big to Fail: The Transatlantic Debate January 2011

Policy Brief 10-27: How Europe Can Muddle Through Its Crisis December 2010

Policy Brief 10-14: In Defense of Europe's Grand Bargain June 2010

Op-ed: Greek Deal Lets Banks Profit from "Immoral Hazard" May 6, 2010

Op-ed: The Follies of Federalism August 5, 2007

Op-ed: Liberalism Needs Central Power July 4, 2007

Book: Transforming the European Economy September 2004